![]() |
| Gokstad ship |
The boat itself was found in pretty great shape, as it had by buried under blue clay, preserving the wood from moisture. Viking kings were often buried with their ships in mounds with close views to the sea. The majority of these mounds were looted by grave-robbers or collapsed when the wood rotted. Gokstad is among the largest of these boats and was found with 64 shields in its hull. There are spaces for 32 oars. This king was unusually wealthy and sailed with a double crew. Thirty two men slept while the others rowed.
![]() |
| Detail of the ribs of the Gokstad |
![]() |
| Oesburg ship |
There was a belief in the afterlife for these people, so many were buried with objects that would aid them with travel. This included oxen, horses, sleighs (sledges), and food. The Oesburg ship was found with all sorts of food preparation items and tools - axes, shovels, etc. - giving a clear picture of the technologies of the day.
![]() |
| A sledge found with the Oesburg |
It's an unlikely feat, even by today's standards, but gives credence to the capabilities of the Vikings to raid and terrorize England for so long.
All of this history (even if just a snapshot from a few short years in the late 800s) lends me some insight into the collective mind of Norwegians. It's been said that Norwegians gained their psychological and sociological views from interaction with the sometimes harsh and unforgiving landscape that surrounds them. They have been forced to make everything for themselves, until very recently - their clothes, their tools, their homes, their music and their art - and that this self-reliance has fostered a sense of pride in individual aesthetics and duty. There is a sense in Norway that everything has been hand-crafted and fine tuned - that each line has been contemplated and every curve was manipulated with an intent. It's a very palpable sense when you walk around the older sections of Oslo, or look at the ship yards around Aker Bryyge.
Politics and foreign affairs have followed this mindset, with the understanding that the self should govern the self (not a central power or authoritative control) simply because the individual knows whats best for them. That each should share their wealth in times of abundance because we all share our poverty in lean times. There is an idea that countries with better weather and, consequently, more idle populations have the leisure to create drama in political realms and the time to create struggles for power - the opposite of the wants of Norsk farmers.
More on this topic to come.







